Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by tehwebguy on Friday September 25, 2015 @11:16AM
(#10278625)
My home security system has a "duress code" that will disable the alarm sound and silently alert the company. It's not the reverse of the normal one, it's a different one that can be set.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by shanecleveland on Friday September 25, 2015 @11:44AM
(#10278775)
Our system has the same thing. I can see how this would be a useful feature across other devices/technology – If I sign in this way, do this, etc.
Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by tedunangst on Friday September 25, 2015 @05:38PM
(#10280855)
I wonder what you're supposed to when the guy holding the gun says "Give the alarm code. Good. Now give me the duress code."
Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by tfigment on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:21PM
(#10281723)
You give him any code. Its not like he is going to use it.
If there is a pattern like ChuckMcM's where its +1 then give then give that one. Of course in all probability this scenario will never happen and the xkcd wrench is used instead.
Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by cbhl on Friday September 25, 2015 @12:16PM
(#10278989)
How likely are you to actually remember the code when you're under duress, though?
Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by ChristianBundy on Friday September 25, 2015 @12:54PM
(#10279260)
More than 0%, which makes it more useful than not.
Re:Forcing suspects to reveal phone passwords is unconstitut...
by tsotha on Friday September 25, 2015 @04:31PM
(#10280504)
You could make it an easy one. Say your normal code is 5829. The panic code should be something like 1111. You'll never key it in accidentally, and people have codes like that, so it won't tip off an assailant.