Mozilla fixed a 14-year-old bug in Firefox, Adblock Plus uses less memory

Re:Mozilla fixed a 14-year-old bug in Firefox, Adblock Plus ... by nitrogen on Friday September 25, 2015 @02:29AM (#10276659)

The most egregious site breakage from ad blockers is when sites can't handle the absence of their Adobe or Google JS. Some sites have large amounts of content that is only loaded via three levels of third-party-JS indirection. Others will try to fire an event to Google Analytics on every click, but if GA doesn't load, an error is thrown that prevents the click's default action.

I was making a $1000-range purchase on an ecommerce site that was utterly broken by my refusal to be tracked in intimate detail, and their product manager was basically, "eh." So I worked around it by catching the errors for them in the browser inspector. This is the type of breakage that site developers absolutely should be fixing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mozilla fixed a 14-year-old bug in Firefox, Adblock Plus ... by yAnonymous on Friday September 25, 2015 @10:54AM (#10278506)

>when sites can't handle the absence of their Adobe

When sites that require flash break, isn't that a win for the user?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Mozilla fixed a 14-year-old bug in Firefox, Adblock Plus ... by nitrogen on Friday September 25, 2015 @01:58PM (#10279624)

Adobe makes more than Flash. They have a number of user tracking, profiling, and A/B testing systems, plus an email delivery and segmentation system. Some or all of those things started as Omniture. Google also has Google Tag Manager, which is a third-party JS for injecting more third-party JS. When half your site's content is loaded by Adobe into "mbox"es, triggered by JS loaded by Google Tag Manager, it's a nightmare for real developers and end users alike even with everything working.

[ Parent | on HN ]