News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Approach to Automated Company Classification by nl on Thursday September 24, 2015 @08:33AM (#10271211)
Hm.

It seems to work somewhat for SV startup companies, but fails pretty badly on others.

Eg:

IBM

https://www.getcontext.io/classifier/#/about/ibm: Evenly distributed between Augmented Reality/Cloud Computing/Cloud Infrastructure/Entertainment/Fintech/HR

Google

https://www.getcontext.io/classifier/#/about/google - apparently about virtual currency and crypto currency as much as a search engine.

Ford: No result

GE: Serves results for GEICO

Re:New Approach to Automated Company Classification by vnture on Thursday September 24, 2015 @08:58AM (#10271307)
Hi NL, thx for giving our hack a spin. We are working on it. Next version will have auto generated feature trees which will result in much better results.
Re:New Approach to Automated Company Classification by Bydom on Thursday September 24, 2015 @09:08AM (#10271350)
Nice tool.

But as nl stated, not that accurate for some companies.

Would be great if you could describe in more detail how you create the classification.

Re:New Approach to Automated Company Classification by claudio_fedger on Thursday September 24, 2015 @09:27AM (#10271424)
thx, recognized the variance, two things: results are based on a tech domain specific vector (based on 1.2m tech articles / 20y), so non-techs fall off. We source content on requested entities live. Descriptions of younger entities are more concise/less global -> more valid classification. But then again, our assumption was that there is more demand for classification of little known entities than for F100s. But we are here to validate/falsify that assumption.
Re:New Approach to Automated Company Classification by claudio_fedger on Thursday September 24, 2015 @09:28AM (#10271427)
*vector space
Re:New Approach to Automated Company Classification by vnture on Thursday September 24, 2015 @08:12AM (#10271145)
Hey everyone! We have set up a demo, feel free to give it a try, all feedback is welcome! Thanks