News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Writing Good C++14 by Default [pdf] by flohofwoe on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @10:24AM (#10265142)
Hmm ok, this has probably increased a lot since I last dabbled with Rust. This was about a year ago, and the speed reminded me of a C++ static analyzer, which kinda made sense to me :)

Even in C++ land there are massive differences in compiler speed Clang on Linux/OSX is easily 10x faster than the Visual Studio compiler without advanced tweaks (however, for some reason, clang on Windows is also very slow).

Re:Writing Good C++14 by Default [pdf] by kibwen on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @10:53AM (#10265351)
Yes, when I talk about C++ compiler speed I generally mean Clang, since it's a widely-available high-quality implementation with compiler speed as an explicit priority. In the context of Rust it's doubly relevant since they both use LLVM. Compiler speed wasn't an explicit priority for the Rust developers in the run-up to 1.0, but these days it's essentially top priority (hence the aforementioned middle end overhaul, though it has more benefits than just incremental recompilation), and the speed of the compiler has already more than doubled since 1.0.