News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ad Blocking: The Unnecessary Internet Apocalypse by mbubb on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @09:02AM (#10264730)
Yes except that ad revenues are the lion's share of revenue for the companies that dominate the current internet.
Re:Ad Blocking: The Unnecessary Internet Apocalypse by meeper16 on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @09:27AM (#10264842)
You're forgetting that the largest content companies are also the largest advertsising companies. For example, Google spends billions every quarter advertising. This is also why they maintained a $1Bil partnership with AOL believe it or not. Yahoo, Microsoft/Bing and the list goes on. All of their ad spending is part of what they consider TAC or Traffic Acquisition Costs.
Re:Ad Blocking: The Unnecessary Internet Apocalypse by mbubb on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @11:31AM (#10265627)
Yes, I agree - it is an ouroboros (or whatever you call that snake eating its own tail). Ad tech has a byzantine complexity that is as complex on the business side as it is on the tech side: http://www.lumapartners.com/resource-center/lumascapes-2/
Re:Ad Blocking: The Unnecessary Internet Apocalypse by SmellyGeekBoy on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @09:50AM (#10264942)
Google?
Re:Ad Blocking: The Unnecessary Internet Apocalypse by mbubb on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @11:28AM (#10265600)
In 2014, Google's ad revenue amounted to almost 59.06 billion US dollars. That year, advertising accounted for 89.5 percent of the online company's total revenues.

http://www.statista.com/statistics/266249/advertising-revenu...