Re:Fukushima
by fridek on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:20PM
(#10261785)
Ah, so it's one of those moments when there are contradicting studies and without getting a PhD on the subject one can't have a meaningful opinion. I just wish there was a good way of settling such situations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Actually in this instance that is not the case.
It is the case of misrepresenting the actual data and making a more sensational misleading headline.
See the editor's note in the original Scientific American article. It simply confirms the statements made by CEJournal.