Matt Blaze: How unpredictable screening helps terrorists

Re:Matt Blaze: How unpredictable screening helps terrorists by sethg on Thursday December 31, 2009 @02:07PM (#1024774)

the best terrorist strategy (as long as they have enough volunteers)

Do they have enough volunteers? The Shoe Bomber and the Undie Bomber, compared with the team that pulled off 9/11, are a couple of amateurish mooks. If these are the best men that al-Qaeda can send against the United States, they must not have a very deep bench.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Matt Blaze: How unpredictable screening helps terrorists by mattm on Thursday December 31, 2009 @04:36PM (#1025029)

If you recall, at least one of the 9/11 hijackers almost missed his flight because he was late. Al-Qaeda is not sending its best men for these missions. Why would an organization send its best men if they are going to end up dead or in jail?

It doesn't make sense. You send the worst people possible that have a chance of pulling it off.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Matt Blaze: How unpredictable screening helps terrorists by CamperBob on Thursday December 31, 2009 @07:40PM (#1025272)

That's just it... the people who pulled off 9/11 were a bunch of amateurish mooks. A bunch of amateurish mooks with an 18 in the Luck department is still dangerous.

Just as in this case, there were any number of measures already in place that could have stopped 9/11, if they had only been followed. More rules are not the answer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Matt Blaze: How unpredictable screening helps terrorists by dandelany on Saturday January 02, 2010 @02:24AM (#1026922)

Well, sort of. They were 19 amateurish mooks who had gone to flight school. That's a far cry from a couple of idiots with unsuccessful bombs.

[ Parent | on HN ]