News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Revival of Concorde by gaius on Saturday September 19, 2015 @12:50AM (#10243343)
The kid in me wants to see Concorde fly as an aircraft, but the working adult would see it as yet another toy for the very rich, undeserving of any special consideration from my ilk.

Did you ever hear the term "jet set" used to describe the glamorous social elite, well that term comes from the days when international air travel was the exclusive preserve of the super rich. Nowadays you can jump on a plane for less than the cost of a meal at the airport (+ taxes of course). Small-minded attitudes like yours would have kept us living in caves because people in mud huts were the "undeserving rich".

Re:The Revival of Concorde by andreasvc on Saturday September 19, 2015 @08:44AM (#10244113)
> Small-minded attitudes like yours would have kept us living in caves because people in mud huts were the "undeserving rich".

Not having such cheap flights might ultimately have been for the better. Flying has become very cheap, but we're not paying the true cost in terms of environmental damage.

Re:The Revival of Concorde by superuser2 on Saturday September 19, 2015 @03:32PM (#10245299)
As far as international air travel, I've never seen a flight from the US to Europe for less than $1,000. That's a damn expensive airport meal.

Short-haul commuter flights are a different thing entirely.

Re:The Revival of Concorde by gaadd33 on Saturday September 19, 2015 @09:00PM (#10246144)
Really? I routinely travel to US to Europe for between $600 and $800. Still not an airport meal but not that insane.
Re:The Revival of Concorde by gaius on Sunday September 20, 2015 @03:40AM (#10246855)
A flight between any two European countries is still international. €10 + taxes flights are easy to find.
Re:The Revival of Concorde by acheron on Saturday September 19, 2015 @05:54PM (#10245657)
(accidentally downvoted you, sorry.)