News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by Yaggo on Friday September 18, 2015 @12:52AM (#10237522)
HTTP 1.1: 2.0 s HTTP 2.0: 1.6 s

Not very dramatic diffence. Location Europe, using 4G connection.

HTTP 2.0 is surely nice for initial page load but for subsequent data loads I prefer websocket (in the context of SPAs).

Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by itsbits on Friday September 18, 2015 @03:01AM (#10237853)
"for subsequent data loads I prefer websocket"

There is notable difference here. Developer needs to write code to implement server-push in Websockets but HTTP2 servers will do that for you by sending all dependancy files with a single request.