News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The HTTP/2 implementation. Parent comment

Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by pbz on Thursday September 17, 2015 @11:54AM (#10234050)
For me it was: HTTP/1.1 => 3.07s vs HTTP/2 => 0.76s
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by takeda on Thursday September 17, 2015 @12:23PM (#10234292)
I was getting similar result in FF until :/ disabled caching, then 1&2 got very close values. So the 0.76 doesn't look accurate.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The HTTP/2 implementation by pbz on Thursday September 17, 2015 @01:02PM (#10234597)
In incognito I got 3.33s for v1.1 and 1.24s for v2 in Chrome and 3.30s (v1.1) and 1.43s (v2) in FF.

You're right that in FF/Chrome for runs N+2 I get about half of the first run (0.86s for v2) so it looks like there's some kind of caching going on -- it's still twice as fast with v2.

[ Parent | on HN ]