Re:Why WhatsApp Only Needs 50 Engineers for Its 900M Users
by rifung on Wednesday September 16, 2015 @12:15PM
(#10227667)
How do you know if an engineer is average vs one of the best?
I haven't heard of anyone who has figured out how to measure an engineer's abilities.
Some people test algorithms. Others test how often they've shipped things. Most just look for years of experience. A few even test whether you know certain facts.
Re:Why WhatsApp Only Needs 50 Engineers for Its 900M Users
by segmondy on Wednesday September 16, 2015 @01:50PM
(#10228451)
Interviews!
Re:Why WhatsApp Only Needs 50 Engineers for Its 900M Users
by rifung on Wednesday September 16, 2015 @05:29PM
(#10230041)
I haven't heard of a single company that has nailed down interviews. I was going to mention interviews but figured that if you couldn't measure how much an employee contributes, you'd have a much harder time measuring how much a prospective employee could contribute given a much shorter time to test them.
Re:Why WhatsApp Only Needs 50 Engineers for Its 900M Users
by asmosoinio on Wednesday September 16, 2015 @12:22PM
(#10227738)
"...to find the best and brightest engineers."
Who doesn't say that though? No company says they hire average engineers.
But I agree that their success does kind of prove that they succeeded in that.
WhatsApp only needs 50 engineers because of who they hire. Even using Erlang, I pretty sure they would need more than 50 engineers if they hired mainly around average engineers.