I don't think that ordinary people are the problem. If by ordinary people you mean natural persons* . In the US government, the elected officials should represent the will of the people who elected them. The problem is that special interests find that money is better spent through lobbying. This allows them to buy votes and even write laws. A massive amount of money is spent lobbying:

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/index.php

This money obviously has an effect. Ordinary people aren't creating lobbying groups.

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_person

> I don't think that ordinary people are the problem.

I didn't say that they were. I said that they were the ones adversely affected by campaign finance restrictions.

The rubes think that that's an accident and that it could be fixed. The cynics think that that was the goal and know that it won't. The realists know that it was inevitable.

> The problem is that special interests find that money is better spent through lobbying.

That's because "we" keep voting for folks who set up programs "to do good". That always fails because regulatory capture always happens.

Either we're insane or we want to be fleeced.

The only way to stop being fleeced is to insist that govt stop doing things.

We could also outlaw corporate personhood.

I think this is about as much of a third rail as exists in human civilization. The corporations would never allow us to outlaw corporate personhood.