News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hitchens: The truth about airplane security measures by ghshephard on Tuesday December 29, 2009 @12:56PM (#1020883)
The TSA leadership consists of bright, passionate, dedicated individuals. I doubt any of us, given the information and resources at their command, could make significantly better decisions than they have.

I read Bruce Schneir's interview with Kip Hawley back in 2007, and came away with the belief that we have a team in place that has some significant knowledge of managing aviation security:

http://www.schneier.com/interview-hawley.html

As for what happened on Christmas, Bruce concisely describes a fairly common mantra about aviation security:

"Basically, there are three broad ways of defending airplanes: preventing bad people from getting on them (ID checks), preventing bad objects from getting on them (passenger screening, baggage screening), and preventing bad things from happening on them (reinforcing the cockpit door, sky marshals)."

And, with the exception of not getting millimeter-wave/back-scatter technology in place for full body scanning (which would have trivially caught the Christmas underwear bomber - and the lack of this technology at security checkpoints is perhaps the one real-failure of the TSA), I think the TSA has done an admirable job.

Note - one thing most people don't understand, is that by creating a rule which states "You must sit down in the last hour of flight" - the goal isn't to prevent mad-bombers from standing up, it's to make it very clear which ones the mad bombers are for the Sky Marshals and Airline crew - it's for a week, and the rule (hopefully) is given a pass for those who clearly need to go to the washroom, need a blanket, etc...

Re:Hitchens: The truth about airplane security measures by kelnos on Thursday December 31, 2009 @06:04AM (#1024123)
Somewhat morbidly entertainingly, with the "no standing up in the last hour of flight" rule, the underwear bomber might have been successful, given that either a) no one would have gotten up to try to subdue him, or b) the first person who got up to try to subdue him would have been subdued by another as a potential terrorist.
Re:Hitchens: The truth about airplane security measures by krschultz on Tuesday December 29, 2009 @01:38PM (#1020983)
Don't let facts dilute a good populist and/or libertarian rant against "dumb" government.

Is nobody noticing this guy got on a plane in another country? Why the mindless hammering on the American TSA?

Re:Hitchens: The truth about airplane security measures by CWuestefeld on Tuesday December 29, 2009 @01:41PM (#1020990)
I don't see anyone raising a fuss about the attempted attack itself. The fuss is all about the TSA's silly response to it.