News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Functional Programming Doesn’t Work (and what to do about it). Parent comment

Re:Functional Programming Doesn’t Work (and what to do about... by Deestan on Tuesday December 29, 2009 @09:22AM (#1020496)
And it should(+) always be refactored to match the new assumptions in a meaningful way.

I get your point, I just meant that "doesn't work" is quite a stretch from "doesn't allow ugly global variable hacks".

(+) http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2119.html#anchor3

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Functional Programming Doesn’t Work (and what to do about... by foldr on Wednesday December 30, 2009 @05:33AM (#1022255)
If there is information that needs to be accessible across several not-otherwise-very-interdependent modules of a program, then you need to have something with essentially all the properties of a global variable. That doesn't' necessarily mean that you need a single identifier with global scope, but it does mean that you need something with essentially the same properties.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Functional Programming Doesn’t Work (and what to do about... by bad_user on Tuesday December 29, 2009 @11:45AM (#1020713)
Since when are global variables ugly hacks?
[ Parent | on HN ]