Re:Functional Programming Doesn’t Work (and what to do about...
by silentbicycle on Tuesday December 29, 2009 @08:56AM
(#1020459)
I don't think he's dropping Erlang, just deciding that allowing small amounts of imperative / impure code to appear when it greatly simplifies things is a worthwhile trade-off. (His last post, about using the Erlang process dictionary, is along the same lines.)
Also, his archives are worth a read, particularly the Purely Functional Retrogames series. Excellent stuff.
Also, his archives are worth a read, particularly the Purely Functional Retrogames series. Excellent stuff.