News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America in flames by Zmetta on Friday September 11, 2015 @10:54AM (#10203984)
Too many environmentally minded people are under the impression that environmental preservation means holding an ecological system in stasis to prevent change. I think this is a decent article showing a few of the reasons that those ideas need a little rethinking on what it means to help the environment.
Re:America in flames by ghouse on Friday September 11, 2015 @10:59AM (#10204019)
Disagree: Environmentalists (at least here in California) understand that fire has a role in forest management. Parties opposed to that course of action are the homeowners in the forests and portions of the timber industry who would prefer to log the unnaturally dense forests (caused by fire suppression).
Re:America in flames by sp332 on Friday September 11, 2015 @11:23AM (#10204178)
From the other side of the country, I'm glad to know there are some sane environmentalists in CA. We only hear about the stupid ones over here.
Re:America in flames by XorNot on Friday September 11, 2015 @11:41AM (#10204280)
It's worth considering that this angle is frequently and aggressively pushed by parties which want to discredit all environmentalists for various reasons.
Re:America in flames by sp332 on Friday September 11, 2015 @11:49AM (#10204339)
Or all Californians :)
Re:America in flames by sageikosa on Friday September 11, 2015 @01:18PM (#10204899)
One decent underwater rock-slide in Hawaii will end the need to debate conservation in California. Likewise in the Azores for New Jersey. Nature doesn't judge nor plan, it just happens.