Re:Einstein’s Parable of Quantum Insanity
by eli_gottlieb on Thursday September 10, 2015 @10:27PM
(#10201673)
For being the top purveyor of maximum-entropy methods, Jaynes really should have been more willing to accept a probabilistic theory of fundamental physics.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Einstein’s Parable of Quantum Insanity
by OscarCunningham on Friday September 11, 2015 @05:45AM
(#10202794)
Jaynes believed that the only kind of probability was that caused by uncertainty about the true state of the world. So he was advocating MAXENT as a way to summarise one's (lack of) knowledge about some system.
In fact, this point of view probably made him less likely to accept a probabilistic theory of fundamental physics. If you've discovered how a deterministic universe can appear random, and how probabilities can still be useful for measuring one's ignorance, then it's reasonable to suspect that these are the only kinds of probabilities and that the universe really is deterministic.
Re:Einstein’s Parable of Quantum Insanity
by eli_gottlieb on Friday September 11, 2015 @08:27AM
(#10203242)
And how can states of knowledge be probabilistic if the mind isn't made out of something related to its function?