News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Data is not an asset, it’s a liability by brianpan on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:51PM (#10201253)
I think the better analogy is inventory, which is an asset. The value of data depreciates over time. Having too much data that is not producing insight or value is inefficient asset allocation.

In other words, lean principles should be applied to data. Reduce data collection that doesn't add value. Calling data a liability is not quite the right analogy for me.

Re:Data is not an asset, it’s a liability by riskable on Friday September 11, 2015 @09:30AM (#10203526)
The problem with this is that while the value of data may depreciate over time the cost to store it also costs less over time due to Moore's law and Kryder's law.
Re:Data is not an asset, it’s a liability by brianpan on Saturday September 12, 2015 @12:13PM (#10208439)
The depreciation isn't the important part. The article suggests considering data as a liability in the accounting sense. But the author should have stopping at saying it's a liability in the non-accounting definition.

Assets have value, but there is risk associated with it. Assets like inventory can lose value because of depreciation, or because demand for the finished good has dried up, there's a risk of theft, there's a cost of storage, etc.

Data should be viewed as an asset like inventory and lean principles can be used to reduce your risk and produce customer value efficiently.

Re:Data is not an asset, it’s a liability by stephengillie on Thursday September 10, 2015 @11:53PM (#10201932)
Also, both are stored in warehouses.