Re:San Francisco Should Always Have a Subway Under Construction
by Sanddancer on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @12:24AM
(#10189664)
The poorly discussed situation is that California High Speed Rail really is a backbone type service. While SFO<->LAX is certainly the big point, the intermediary cities -- San Jose with a million people, Fresno with a half million people, Bakersfield with 363 thousand people -- are going to see substantial benefits too. Add in the cities that are planned for subsequent phases -- San Diego with a million people, Sacramento with a half million people, Oakland with 400 thousand people -- and the reasons for the project start becoming more obvious.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:San Francisco Should Always Have a Subway Under Construction
by Gibbon1 on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @05:46AM
(#10190540)
The one that clinched it for me was an article pointing out that the large airports in California are at capacity and expansion is either expensive, or impossible. You either need to spend couple of billion each to expand those air ports, or throw the money at high speed rail.
Also the big expense is not the high speed rail part of the system, is the commuter rail part through the bay area and LA. That;s the expensive bit. Not the straight high speed sections through the central valley.