News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Node v4.0.0 by dcwca on Tuesday September 08, 2015 @04:20PM (#10187994)
> As for no recommend approach - that's deliberate. I don't think most people working on Node want a Rails equivalent

This is a useful way to understand what Node is. Node's core API is for building any sort of network service: A DNS server, an SMTP server, HTTP server, socket listener, etc. and so it applies to a wide and varied set of problems. Rails is for building a very specific type of database-backed web application.

Re:Node v4.0.0 by pluma on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @05:23AM (#10190496)
Exactly. I don't think Node is a good fit for monolithic CRUD apps. These are already solved problems in various other languages. Instead Node lets you compose small purpose-built modules.
Re:Node v4.0.0 by techdragon on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @08:16AM (#10190926)
Now out only problem is how to build decoupled/distributed micro services.

I'd argue only Erlang and Elixir are going to survive into the multi core multi server future, but that would be little more than a slightly educated opinion unless I take the time to write a very large explanation with cited references. I don't have time for that this week.

Re:Node v4.0.0 by pluma on Thursday September 10, 2015 @06:21AM (#10197166)
Personally I prefer having a monolithic app at the core and using Node as the glue to tie everything together (e.g. to provide "real-time" features or to integrate third party services).

I think what's holding Erlang back is mostly its rather obscure syntax. Only a mother could love that.

Re:Node v4.0.0 by vkjv on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @10:14AM (#10191550)
We are an (almost) completely node.js team and are having quite a bit of success using it for microservices. gRPC makes communication fast and easy, while Docker and Kubernetes make deployment and composition just as simple.