Re:The New, Terrifying, No-Electronics US Flight Security Rules
by jrockway on Monday December 28, 2009 @09:49AM
(#1018600)
As it is, the majority of fliers suffer both inconvenience and the possibility of being murdered.
Similarly, I think cars should be limited to 5mph, because if they can go faster, a drunk (or just plain incompetent) driver could easily kill everyone on the road. So what if drunk drivers are a problem that only affect 1 in a million people, we need to take action at any cost! Any risk of death is unacceptable.
I've had two muslim boyfriends in the past
Clearly you are a terrorist sympathizer and should be added to the no-fly list. If you want to leave your country, apply for an exit visa and swim across the Channel. (It's too risky to allow you to take the train; you would probably blow it up given your tendencies.)
Pretty intelligent sounding, huh...
This sort of logic is why I'm glad I don't live in the UK.
Similarly, I think cars should be limited to 5mph, because if they can go faster, a drunk (or just plain incompetent) driver could easily kill everyone on the road. So what if drunk drivers are a problem that only affect 1 in a million people, we need to take action at any cost! Any risk of death is unacceptable.
I've had two muslim boyfriends in the past
Clearly you are a terrorist sympathizer and should be added to the no-fly list. If you want to leave your country, apply for an exit visa and swim across the Channel. (It's too risky to allow you to take the train; you would probably blow it up given your tendencies.)
Pretty intelligent sounding, huh...
This sort of logic is why I'm glad I don't live in the UK.