News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:After selling his company to Google, this man now wants t... by gadrfgaesgysd on Tuesday September 08, 2015 @08:41AM (#10185309)
Perhaps some distinction between domains could be made.

The law should/could be interpreted in a way so that a website belongs only on a certain domain. Then access outside of it would be uninvited?

Re:After selling his company to Google, this man now wants t... by cwyers on Tuesday September 08, 2015 @10:15AM (#10185782)
I mean, I feel like outlawing cross-domain site access in order to shut down online advertising is like burning the house down while you're still inside it to avoid taking out the trash.
Re:After selling his company to Google, this man now wants t... by gadrfgaesgysd on Tuesday September 08, 2015 @11:28AM (#10186261)
Hyperbole.

Cookies were banned in European Union, e.i. only made available if the user agrees. Then it is up to the user to white/black list sites. The same could be made for external domains.

Most blockers already support that. It is already happening. What we need is merely making it mandatory by law.