Re:Forensic analysis of recent Victoria's Secret photo
by drats on Monday December 28, 2009 @01:11AM
(#1018183)
I can't stop seeing a small black bear tip-toeing along. The resolution is too chunky to say yay or nay to a photoshop on the basis of the body of the beast but I would agree with the other comment that the eyes do seem to be quite luminous considering the distance and the rest of the flash. Such a flash surely should have made the colours of the people a lot brighter and the woman's face, much much closer to the flash, is basically in shadow.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Forensic analysis of recent Victoria's Secret photo
by jcl on Monday December 28, 2009 @02:15PM
(#1019146)
If the picture is indeed not faked, a bear would make more sense; to my understanding, wolves generally avoid humans and are not curious in the way a bear cub might be. It's a better fit for the color and fluffiness, too.
Re:Forensic analysis of recent Victoria's Secret photo
by WinterAyars on Monday December 28, 2009 @10:58PM
(#1020019)
It's definitely too big to be a wolf. The size would be appropriate for a bear, and bears are probably more likely than wolves anyway. It's not quite the right shape for a bear, but that's just my opinion.