News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:John McAfee AMA by orthoganol on Thursday September 03, 2015 @10:13AM (#10165043)
No need for the patronizing tone... Isn't that an ad hominem? People can abuse this information to justify anti social behavior, but I'm not sure how your point challenges its validity...
Re:John McAfee AMA by ablation on Thursday September 03, 2015 @10:27AM (#10165112)
Was it patronising? And was it an ad hominem? I didn't really read that into it at all. Just another opinion on one man's opinion.
Re:John McAfee AMA by orthoganol on Thursday September 03, 2015 @10:39AM (#10165175)
Huh, I don't know, just seemed like a patronizing way of phrasing something. People do it subconsciously a lot. It's not like it offended or bothered me, was just pointing out that it had such a tone, and noting that conversations or debates are better when people just say things directly.

About the ad hominem, saying something sounds like an excuse isn't addressing the argument made. If OP disagrees with the argument, he's welcome to make arguments that address my own.