News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s look, evolved by meerita on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @07:44PM (#10156557)
It shouldn't be a problem. In science, everything must be tested and proved if you want to know the truth or the effectiveness of an theory. Design is a science, so it can be measured and developed by tests of all kinds, even emotionals.
Re:Google’s look, evolved by ulfw on Wednesday September 02, 2015 @03:56AM (#10157955)
That's a pretty one-sided statement. One could easily argue the opposite, that good design is an art form, not a science.
Re:Google’s look, evolved by meerita on Wednesday September 02, 2015 @10:49AM (#10159581)
Art is a science too. One different thing is that some artists don't care about the facts. Everything can be explained with numbers.
Re:Google’s look, evolved by jhanschoo on Friday September 04, 2015 @09:32PM (#10173565)
Whereas a design studio with sufficient resources should fare better with a data-driven approach, a sole designer or small team with time and feedback constraints will probably do better with traditional methodology. Traditional methodologies might have certain quack dogmatic rules and processes, but it offers a battle-tested baseline.