News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google’s look, evolved by hanspeter on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @07:03PM (#10156394)
Your claim was that a favicon could be a different font than in the logo. But these examples are all a part of the logos. Google would have needed to rebrand their logo to do the same.
Re:Google’s look, evolved by raldi on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @07:52PM (#10156588)
The claim was, "Using a different font [on your favicon than the one you use in your wordmark] would make absolutely no sense."

I believe I have successfully refuted that claim.