News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Myths about /dev/urandom by jfoutz on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @10:20AM (#10152489)
I think for ordinary programmers, stories of failures might be more effective. Case studies, perhaps even a bit embellished to make them more compelling. Something along the lines of Kurzweil's cuckoo's egg. Except shorter and more recent.

I think what you're getting at is a specific technology won't save you, it's the security mindset that's needed. Convincing programmers there really are bad people who want to pick apart your systems is the problem. Once their convinced, once they take security seriously, they'll do better.

They might start out doing a terrible job, but with the security mindset, they'll improve. They'll seek out problems and solve them. Rather than pretending it's not an issue, or blindly apply security secret sauce like "use bcrypt"

Re:Myths about /dev/urandom by wglb on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @11:34AM (#10153060)
What is Kurzweil's cuckoo's egg

Do you perhaps mean Cliff Stoll?

Re:Myths about /dev/urandom by jfoutz on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @12:07PM (#10153374)
Yes! My pre coffee memory failed me. Thanks.