Re:S3QL: an S3 FS with encryption, de-dup, immutable trees a...
by riquito on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @04:51AM
(#10151347)
Anecdotal, but I use btrfs on my laptop since august 2014, had a good number of hard power off not related to btrfs and the filesystem never failed me once.
I had some problem with space though using intensively docker: in some situations btrfs thought that the free space was finished and I had to manually rebuild the metadata.
Re:S3QL: an S3 FS with encryption, de-dup, immutable trees a...
by vidarh on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @05:22AM
(#10151431)
The Docker-on-Btrfs problems are/were severe enough that CoreOS now defaults to overlayfs on Ext4. I have a bunch of EC2 servers on CoreOS, and we ended up wiping Docker partitions regularly until that switch...
Re:S3QL: an S3 FS with encryption, de-dup, immutable trees a...
by pja on Tuesday September 01, 2015 @09:43AM
(#10152229)
IIRC docker (or any other virtual machine filesystem) in a single image file and hashing filesystems mix really, really badly.
Docker could use BTRFS / ZFS snapshots instead of using whole filesystem image files though, so this ought to get better.
Yeah, btrfs or zfs are the better choice for this than RAID1 in the modern world I think.
ZFS anywhere it runs natively, btrfs on Linux.
(My experience with btrfs is that it’s fine on a server, but on laptops I’ve ended up with unmountable, unfixable filesystems a number of times. To be fair to btrfs I’ve always been able to recover the data though.)