Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ...
by scott_s on Wednesday December 23, 2009 @04:03PM
(#1012850)
He meant in the class of 10x better than the average programmer, which would include all developers in the world, not just the few you can see.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ...
by joe_the_user on Wednesday December 23, 2009 @04:13PM
(#1012865)
Why would the developers you couldn't see be 10x better than the developers you can see?
Could there be a dark matter halo of great programmers lurking around the world's mediocre-programmer-filled corporate cubicals?
Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ...
by scott_s on Wednesday December 23, 2009 @04:14PM
(#1012868)
I meant "the developers you can see" to imply the people around you. That's a small sample size, and not representative of the entire world.
Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ...
by joe_the_user on Wednesday December 23, 2009 @04:52PM
(#1012958)
A small sample size would just imply greater deviation. There's no reason to assume the programmers outside your sample would be x10 better than those in your sample.
Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ...
by scott_s on Wednesday December 23, 2009 @05:09PM
(#1012989)
That only works when you can assume your sample is representative of the global population. Since people are not evenly distributed according to their abilities, that assumption will not hold.