Re:I hired 50 people today. This is what they look like
by markbnine on Tuesday December 22, 2009 @02:36PM
(#1010570)
What if somebody asked people to write something profane? Or political? Or perhaps deface the image of an icon or religious leader? Once you move past written messages, you open up all sorts of avenues. Crowd-sourced politics? Crowd-sourced porn? Crowd-sourced violence? Etc. At what point does Amazon need to filter these requests?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I hired 50 people today. This is what they look like
by pavel_lishin on Tuesday December 22, 2009 @02:45PM
(#1010600)
> Crowd-sourced politics? Crowd-sourced porn?
So?
Re:I hired 50 people today. This is what they look like
by thirdusername on Tuesday December 22, 2009 @02:40PM
(#1010584)
When it's illegal? There's a huge difference between crowd sourcing violence and writing something political (which a lot of people already get payed to do), ones organized crime the other is not.
Re:I hired 50 people today. This is what they look like
by brk on Tuesday December 22, 2009 @04:08PM
(#1010810)
While I don't doubt that everyone has their price... I think you would find it cost-prohibitive to pay enough people to do something like that to have any sort of real-world impact.
People are not going to go out of their way, or risk jail time, for $1.00/task. You'd need to pony up a lot more money (like, I'm guessing, 100's of thousands of dollars) to get enough people to violate basic principles on a large enough scale for this to create some sort of shift.
Re:I hired 50 people today. This is what they look like
by axod on Tuesday December 22, 2009 @04:51PM
(#1010900)
If they're in India, and breaking laws in say the US, I doubt they'd care too much.
Re:I hired 50 people today. This is what they look like
by imgabe on Tuesday December 22, 2009 @02:41PM
(#1010585)
I don't see any problem as long as they're not asking them to break any laws. Ultimately it's up to the parties involved to obey the law though. If someone puts an ad for a hitman in the help wanted section of the newspaper, should the newspaper be held responsible?