Re:A (Terrifying) Traffic Analysis of Windows 10
by howdoipython on Friday August 21, 2015 @02:26PM
(#10099343)
I highly doubt the source was a Czechoslovakian guy because Czechoslovakia no longer exists. Maybe someone from the Czech Republic though.
Re:A (Terrifying) Traffic Analysis of Windows 10
by 6d0debc071 on Friday August 21, 2015 @02:30PM
(#10099370)
Ah, good point -edits-
Re:A (Terrifying) Traffic Analysis of Windows 10
by acqq on Friday August 21, 2015 @02:34PM
(#10099404)
Note the comment of "Stephen Smoogen" to the apparent systemoverlord's "check" of the claims (which was on VM, and using pre-release Windows):
"There is also a difference if your network link is detected as being 'metered' (in that if the system thinks the network is metered it will not send as much data). I have noticed that for other windows what a system sends if it is on 'real' hardware or virtual machine are also different. My guess is that Microsoft assumes a 'guest' machine isn't real and worth checking.
To test the article, I would expect that I would need to set up a hub, put the box and the capture system on it and run it on a live hardware with a 'real' account. Without doing that then 'results will vary' is going to be the norm."
https://systemoverlord.com/blog/2015/08/16/so-is-windows-10-...
hasn't been able to reproduce the traffic analysis on casual inspection.
Edit: Here's what I believe to be the original source of the claim:
http://aeronet.cz/news/analyza-windows-10-ve-svem-principu-j...
And the translation:
http://localghost.org/posts/a-traffic-analysis-of-windows-10