No. I don't think a person who is living at a bare subsistence level would be said to be living a life of leisure.
Also, a person could have a seemingly easy job that pays a lot, or a hard job that pays little. In my view your distinctions are wrung to fit the point you're trying to make.
Re:A New Aristocracy [pdf]
by yummyfajitas on Thursday August 20, 2015 @08:56AM
(#10091507)
You seem to have confused the US with India.
Basically no one in the US is living at a "bare subsistence level". People with $0 in market income still consume approx $20k/year in the US, which is more than 3x the mean income (after adjusting for cost of living) over here. If $20k is "bare subsistence" then I should be surrounded by at least 500M corpses.
By "life of leisure", I mean a life in which one does not need to work at all in order to have the necessities of life provided. This is the traditional definition of the phrase, no?