To me, Thomas's opinion doesn't appear to be based on facts simply because Impact Team specifically said, "it decided to publish the information in response to alleged lies ALM told its customers about a service that allows members to completely erase their profile information for a $19 fee."
Maybe if he edits his original opinion to not suggest Impact Team released the Database because of marital infidelity?
"We have explained the fraud, deceit, and stupidity of ALM and their members."
"Chances are your man signed up on the world's biggest affair site, but never had one. He just tried to. If that distinction matters."
"Find yourself in here? It was ALM that failed you and lied to you. Prosecute them and claim damages. Then move on with your life. Learn your lesson and make amends. Embarrassing now, but you'll get over it."
This sounds like the real intent, "The Impact Team said it decided to publish the information in response to alleged lies ALM told its customers about a service that allows members to completely erase their profile information for a $19 fee."