News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by muP on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @10:27AM (#10079348)
I disagree. Mozilla signs a very rich contract with search engines like Google and Yahoo. They have more money than they know what to do with.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by detaro on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @10:30AM (#10079353)
They aren't part of Mozilla.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by anotherangrydev on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @11:27AM (#10079691)
Don't be so naive. Do you think you can just walk up to Mozilla and tell them: "Sup guys, just bundle this crap into your browser. Please."?
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by detaro on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @11:47AM (#10079812)
Mozilla claims that they don't get money for the integration, and I don't see a good reason why I shouldn't believe them. Pocket very likely doesn't have that much money lying around, compared to Mozillas budget.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by balladeer on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @12:29PM (#10080132)
That's makes it worse. Mozilla integrating Pocket into Firefox for free.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by JosephRedfern on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @01:13PM (#10080509)
Really? Does it? "Mozilla bundles crapware for financial gain" vs "Mozilla bundling add-on it believes will benefit users".
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by throwaway2048 on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @01:27PM (#10080623)
its sounds a lot more like the situation was "Pocket was friends with some guys at mozilla, and they made up a bunch of bullshit about how it was a benefit to users to push their buddies project"
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by johnny22 on Wednesday August 19, 2015 @04:21AM (#10084238)
where did you get that impression?
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by yellowapple on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @03:06PM (#10081414)
"Mozilla bundles crapware for financial gain" v. "Mozilla bundles crapware without any financial incentive" is a more accurate comparison, and highlights that something is indeed wonky over in Mozillaland.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by pnathan on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @10:19PM (#10083370)
Pocket + Firefox is a pretty stanky integration. Very unpleasant to have it bundled in.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by jdpage on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @11:49PM (#10083586)
Maybe it's time for a standard bookmarking service API? It'd be nice to just be able to plug whatever service I want (if any) into any browser.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by bobcostas55 on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @03:54PM (#10081729)
Greedy is better than stupid.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by acaloiar on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @11:23AM (#10079658)
Yes, but Pocket is integrated with Firefox. Pocket and the Mozilla Foundation formed a partnership that almost certainly includes some sort of compensation or resources in exchange for Pocket's service.
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by muraiki on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @12:42PM (#10080238)
Actually no, it appears that Mozilla is not getting any money from Pocket but rather chose Pocket themselves. https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/38aorv/psa_mozilla...
Re:Multiple Vulnerabilities in Pocket by yarrel on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @04:24PM (#10081907)
That's even weirder.