News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy and childless (1981). Parent comment

Re:Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy... by archagon on Sunday August 16, 2015 @06:09PM (#10070447)
> Guess that the only way out is to wait for the next big one.

Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but that seems like a pretty gross sentiment. "I hope a natural disaster gets these old people out of their homes so me and my hip friends can move into our favorite city." I know you probably didn't mean it that way, but I feel like I see a lot of similar animosity towards the longstanding residents (or as you put it, "entrenched interests") of SF.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy... by raldi on Sunday August 16, 2015 @06:33PM (#10070511)
> "I hope a natural disaster gets these old people out of their homes..."

...and into tall, beautiful apartment buildings in walkable neighborhoods with excellent transit connections, so we can all live here together.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy... by archagon on Sunday August 16, 2015 @06:46PM (#10070548)
For many people, SF wouldn't be SF without the older buildings and neighborhoods. You'd arguably be destroying the character of the city just for the chance to live there.

Also, I don't think I've ever seen an affordable apartment highrise in a major city. Think those new and shiny skyscrapers will be able to compete with rent-controlled housing? What's actually going to happen is that the longtime residents are going to get pushed out into the outskirts while the Silicon Valley rich fill out the city.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy... by raldi on Sunday August 16, 2015 @07:14PM (#10070623)
> For many people, SF wouldn't be SF without the older buildings and neighborhoods.

See, I think the soul of San Francisco actually comes from its people.

Given a choice between preserving buildings or saving people from displacement, I think the latter does more to preserve the essence of the city.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy... by ucaetano on Monday August 17, 2015 @04:05AM (#10071770)
The character of cities changes all the time, who are we to say what should be the character of a city? Let it change, let it evolve. SF's character only became what it is by changing from it's previous character, again and again and again.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Changing San Francisco is foreseen as a haven for wealthy... by ucaetano on Monday August 17, 2015 @04:04AM (#10071768)
Sorry, you're reading it wrong. It isn't about old people, it's about entrenched interests, from young, old, rich and poor people who constantly pass legislation stopping others from converting their (others') houses into apartment buildings.

Entrenched interests != longstanding residents. There is some overlap though.

Think of it like the people from Los Altos Hill passing laws effectively banning poor people: the minimum lot size is 1 acre, and all lost can only have on family living in them.

[ Parent | on HN ]