Re:Android libstagefright still exploitable
by vezzy-fnord on Thursday August 13, 2015 @02:53PM
(#10056388)
That's not an SELinux policy? That's just a service statement for Android's init, defining the process' supplementary groups. There is no explicit seclabel I can deduce.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Android libstagefright still exploitable
by semenko on Thursday August 13, 2015 @04:34PM
(#10057039)
Whoops, yep -- definitely wasn't that clear. As pointed out below, the policy is linked to:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/sepolicy/...
Re:Android libstagefright still exploitable
by scintill76 on Thursday August 13, 2015 @02:56PM
(#10056406)
The policy is linked. The service definition was probably quoted to show other aspects of its isolation and privileges, but the comment is not written very clearly.