Re:Firefox 42 will not allow unsigned extensions
by yellowapple on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @08:39PM
(#10045336)
> As a Debian user, I'd like to draw a parallel between these measures and the default requirement for GPG signatures on packages installed by apt
Said parallel is imperfect. With APT, you can add custom signatures (say, if you run a private or organization-specific repo). AFAICT, Firefox offers no such capability.
Said parallel is imperfect. With APT, you can add custom signatures (say, if you run a private or organization-specific repo). AFAICT, Firefox offers no such capability.