News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days. Parent comment

Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by TerryCarlin on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @11:27AM (#10041736)
You are wrong,

Believe it or not, sex by surprise is actually not an euphemism for rape. It is sex without a condom after a woman requests it — even if the sex is consensual — and it's fine-able in Sweden by 5,000 kronor (about $715).

Source http://www.popsugar.com/love/Sex-Surprise-12390242 or http://jezebel.com/5711600/how-aol-news-started-the-sex-by-s... or http://www.newser.com/story/106802/assange-not-actually-want...

Given that the CIA have their agenda in this, it's no surprise that Americans believe the main stream media.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by joesmo on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @12:08PM (#10042112)
You just proved yourself wrong with your own link:

"The allegations against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange are pretty straightforward in terms of Swedish law: he's been accused of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.

"The charges allege that Assange held one woman down using his body weight to sexually assault her and that he raped another woman while she was sleeping." (http://jezebel.com/5711600/how-aol-news-started-the-sex-by-s...)

Yeah, that's rape. Please stop defending rape. Even if it wasn't considered rape in the law, which it is, it should be.

[ Parent | on HN ]