News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days. Parent comment

Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by rayiner on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @10:40AM (#10041375)
> The first 3 dot points read more like a case of a broken condom than exceeding the scope of consent.

Whether or not it was a broken condom or he ripped it on purpose is a red herring. If the allegations are true, he was trying to have sex with a woman he just met while holding her arms down and trying to force her legs open. That's attempted rape.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by another-one-off on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @11:01AM (#10041541)
Later in the paragraph:

> After a while Mr Assange had asked AA what she was doing and why she was squeezing her legs together. [...] Mr Assange let go of AA’s arms and put on a condom [...]

I can read this as being not that great at sex. Depending on how long "a while" is, he might just be in the habit of grabbing his partner. This doesn't seem malicious.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Assange, the law of limitation, and the next eight days by rayiner on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @11:17AM (#10041673)
That might be reasonable, unmalicious behavior if you have a history with someone and can infer things about their state of mind. It's utterly reckless as to someone you just met.
[ Parent | on HN ]