G is for Google

Re:G is for Google by noelsusman on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:32PM (#10037532)

Chromebooks are pretty popular. The first generation wasn't very good but the more recent ones are selling well.

Reader was very popular relative to the size of the RSS reader market.

Google bought Motorola for the patent portfolio and sold off the rest, so I'm not sure how that was a failure. Motorola also turned around their mobile division with the Moto X under Google (over 100% increase in mobile sales due to the Moto X and company line of products)

I remember Orkut being very popular in Asia for a while.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:G is for Google by hobs on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:41PM (#10037593)

All of that I wont argue with, except the characterization that reader was a success because Google owned the market.

I dont see how G closing down reader could have that count in the success column, especially considering how much bad blood it bred for G (and how little effort it would have likely meant to maintain it.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:G is for Google by idlewords on Monday August 10, 2015 @07:02PM (#10038051)

Reader was the living kernel of what could have potentially been a successful Google social network.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:G is for Google by lkbm on Monday August 10, 2015 @11:04PM (#10038884)

Orkut was heavily used in Brazil (and India, according to Wikipedia).

[ Parent | on HN ]