News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Algorithmic Trading: The Play-at-Home Version by murbard2 on Monday August 10, 2015 @04:14PM (#10036992)
Yes and no. If it can be automated, no amount is too small to collect. A hobbyist best shot is to do... things that don't scale. Source: I do too.
Re:Algorithmic Trading: The Play-at-Home Version by tomp on Monday August 10, 2015 @08:22PM (#10038381)
I'm not sure about that. If a $2bn hedge fund finds 100 different "alpha strategies" for turning $20k into $200k, that's still just 1% to their bottom line. Probably not worth the time.
Re:Algorithmic Trading: The Play-at-Home Version by murbard2 on Monday August 10, 2015 @08:57PM (#10038498)
That's $20,000,000 which is enough to warrant at least 10 people working on it.
Re:Algorithmic Trading: The Play-at-Home Version by kittenfluff on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @04:44AM (#10039739)
Remember that a hedge fund only sees 20% of the profit that it generates on behalf of its investors, and a large part of that goes into staffing and infrastructure costs, not to mention that quant traders like to be paid sizable bonuses (and therefore would not want to work on a trade with a small upside).

I find it extremely unlikely (almost inconceivable, in fact) that a hedge fund would divert 10 researchers to work on a trade with $20m of potential upside.

Re:Algorithmic Trading: The Play-at-Home Version by sokoloff on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @07:56AM (#10040327)
"Standard" hedge fund compensation is 2-and-20 (2% of funds under management and 20% of gains), so a $2B fund would yield $40M in the 2% management fee. That's the "keep the lights on money".
Re:Algorithmic Trading: The Play-at-Home Version by murbard2 on Tuesday August 11, 2015 @09:45AM (#10040979)
Ten people, not ten researchers, but that would be towards the upper limit. Point is, $20M is nothing to sneer at, even for a billion dollar hedge fund.