I agree. It's actually the animation of the adverts that I find most distracting. Text, and/or a static image - not an animated gif would be fine. I would enable ad networks that could guarantee that is all they will serve up.
Re:Firefox exploit found in the wild
by juliangregorian on Friday August 07, 2015 @08:02AM
(#10021949)
The distraction is the point. It's no use enabling only the ads that you're easily capable of ignoring.
Personally I think all ads should be served up in a totally passive visual format (png, jpeg, gif) and have no other attributes than a non-javascript link target. That would take care of almost all drive-by injection. But adnetworks serve up what their customers want and their customers want interactive ads because the click-through rates are higher and because otherwise the competition would be doing it and they go out of business.
Ad networks that do serve up javascript should at a minimum pull the script to their own server and audit the code of the script. Good luck with that though.
Fortunately it's easy enough to install an ad blocker and get rid of that part of the problem entirely but it would be nice if users without an ad blocker wouldn't have to worry about this.