Re:“I have already used the name for my programming language...
by mikeash on Thursday August 06, 2015 @10:23AM
(#10016612)
I have long advocated for switching away from normal pronounceable names and to UUIDs for everything. For example, Google's Go could be CFF77685-513C-4B4D-82EC-81C171D52E82 and the older one could be 7EFD13ED-BF35-4547-9701-6E13F0D8911E. If we renamed C to F51AD0F2-8159-4515-BE14-5E9D9AE3372B it would become much easier to search for.
Sincerely, 57C1566F-1DA9-4AAB-9F88-E31C4B950DD6
Re:“I have already used the name for my programming language...
by _wwz4 on Thursday August 06, 2015 @10:36AM
(#10016708)
I agree with you, but actually, 57C1566F-1DA9-4AAB-9F88-E31C4B950DD6 is my UUID.
Re:“I have already used the name for my programming language...
by mikeash on Thursday August 06, 2015 @10:43AM
(#10016767)
Then I'm afraid we must fight to the death to see who has the rightful claim to it, as described in the secret provisions of RFC 4122.
Re:“I have already used the name for my programming language...
by jameshart on Thursday August 06, 2015 @10:54AM
(#10016849)
The first rule of RFC 4122 is that implementers MUST NOT talk about RFC 4122.
C D Go Julia R Rust
Google's gotten a lot better when it comes to searches for C++ (formerly always wrote 'cpp'), Go ('golang'), C#, etc. But when you combine a specific search and the language it's still ambiguous for a lot of these languages.
Forever the discord between branding and specificity.