zv-
Re:Banks Paid $32.6B in Bonuses Amid U.S. Bailout (2009)
on Monday February 09, 2015 @08:54AM (#9021118)
Those banks had contracts with the executives, saying they would get the bonuses if X metrics were met (likely what it was, maybe it was just a straight bonus every year, and the assumption is that they would be fired if they didn't preform). Those contracts don't go away because of a bailout.
I would be interested in legislation that changes this. If a private bank (I don't think there are many truly private banks anymore) wants to give whatever bonuses it wants, I really don't care.
But once public money is involved, I agree we need some strict controls.