zmyrgel

Tried Kubed briefly but there seems to be some issue with contexts. Seemed it did not change context and lists always same context listing when polled. Need to test it bit further.

This project could use a name change as there is already got for git: https://gameoftrees.org/index.html

I thought it means exactly that for X you need to run xenodm. But if you don't want to run it by default you can use "doas rcctl start -f xenodm" to start display manager when needed.

I have a bit opposite experience having worked with both. Oracle has tons of features and docs out of the box which aid you get going. Postgresql has good amount but they just don't compare.

Though to get access to all of the Oracle's features you need a spent a lot on licensing which evens the odds quite a lot.

By looking through the comments it seems many seem to think that smallest GDPR violation will immidiately see 20M fine. Isn't it the last method if previous methods are ignored like giving a warning, smaller fines etc.

So you don't have to do every single perfectly, just that you the basics done properly and your filling to fix things as they are shown to be broken. Well, unless your broken system leaks millions of users data into the wild I'd guess you're pretty safe.

But if the black hole can survive the big bang, therefore it can exist longer that rest of the universe so it seems to have plenty of time to evolve anything.

Or just use actual SSH certificates instead of public keys so you don't need to have authorized_keys file at all.

Nice comparison. It would be interesting to see how different BSD's libc compares to these.

To add to Gracana's comment. M:Tier provides openup tool which will update your base system and packages to match -stable. That way you don't have to patch and compile your kernel yourself. For trustworthiness of M:Tier, several project developers are employed by M:Tier.

When did you try it? They fixed ACPI power management issue in 5.8. So if you tried it before that it might explain the battery life issue. I haven't seen any multiple-second system freezes ever. Did you report those issues in bug tracker or mailing lists?

If speed would be main deciding factor, I'd go with FreeBSD/Linux. OpenBSD network stack is still pretty much under big kernel lock so multiple cores won't help as much. Though in the 5.8 and -current branch they've made lot of progress in making the network stack MP-safe. See undeadly.org hackathon reports for details.

Could you be more specific on what problems you have? Usually OpenBSD has been running quite smoothly. Only issues I've experienced have been on video use. Like I haven't been able to get smooth playback of HD material. And firefox seems to be bit choppy but that is probably my "gazillion tabs" I keep open.

In OpenBSD you can let the kernel do the power management with "sysctl hw.perfpolicy=auto".

Also there was fix in ACPI in 5.8 to fix power use in newer processors. If I remember it correctly the processor didn't use the deep sleep states so they consumed more power.

Only use failover trunk if your wireless network and wired connections share same subnet. Otherwise it work that well. Like once you connect the ethernet cable you lose network connectivity as trunk won't renew your address.

Seems the currently recommended method is to just run dhclient on both wireless and wired interfaces and let the routing table to decide which to use.

This is one of the reasons I'm pushing Go at work. I've had to maintain our current apps which have received very little maintenance work during the years and I wish Go would have been present when they were made.

What documentation do you need? Have you read the manual: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man3/...

You can read example code use by browsing the source codes of the applications listed in the presentation such as netcat and httpd.

I spent two days trying to get selinux working with our servers and just gave up again. I have actual work to be done instead of turning the selinux knobs. Something simple as tame would be welcome, zero administrative overhead but plugs few potential security holes.

You need to look a bit closer to see the difference. APU uses cheaper realtek NIC and soekris uses Intel's. Soekris gives Intel QuickAssist to help encryption (VPN etc.). And soekris is showing up a new model later this year: http://soekris.com/products/net6801.html

But PC-engines boards are nice for their price. I'm considering to get one at home. That or spend a bit more on soekris box/

I like the Intel Atom's. I have a mini-atx case with MSI Intel Atom board with two gigabit ethernet ports. Still tempted to upgrade to newer Atom to be able to go completely passive system. Combine with SSD drive and totally silent server.