yummysoup
PSG is a health care consulting, data science and research firm in Toronto, ON. We use data to find ways to improve health care. Our clients and partners include Ministries of Health, Health Regions, Hospitals, Agencies, Consulting Firms and Universities.
We need help loading, validating, and preparing clinical and financial data for analysis.
We're open to either full- or part-time and would consider students or moonlighters who can dedicate some spare time as long as they are reliable and reasonably available.
Depending on your skills and how you progress, you could also help with data analysis or developing internal tools (usually in python, but sometimes as js web apps).
More info: http://www.preyrasolutions.com/careers/etl_developer.php
* query both services for each address
* if the [lat,lon] are equal (within a threshold), store Joe's result as correct
* store nothing otherwise
Are you storing Google's results in that case?
The url bar and tabs will be a bit small but the page content will look good.
e.g., a command like "tar cfz bak.tgz ~3 ~2/subdirectory ~1" would mean something else once you've "pushd +3".
I always find it hard to undo my sequence changes to get the stack in the same order as before, so usually end up typing "dirs -v" a lot (or its alias) and renumbering my ~N references.
Usually when developing web apps I get things working in Firefox first then test in the other browsers.
Lately I've been doing some work with Canvas and found IE to be the fastest for drawing large (many points) polygons(* ). I never thought I'd say this but it's been a lot more pleasant to develop in IE, at least during the proof-of-concept stage where I haven't done much optimizing or caching.
(* ) I haven't benchmarked whether it's the canvas drawing or javascript engine (or both) that's faster, just that overall I'm getting 30+% better performance from IE