News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

youngone

> Data doesn't fit my pre-conceptions. Better ignore the data.
That wasn't what was claimed by the person I replied to. He claimed at the low rate of firearms murders was a result of the ban. But firearms murders rose after the ban.
The ensuing total ban on handguns ... mean firearm murders are extremely rare

Given that firearm murders rose after the ban (link from jjoonathan), please explain very clearly to me how can the low rate (it was low in the first place) be caused by the ban (you said the ban 'means' the low rate)?

I'm really looking forward to seeing how you can support your claim.