yetanother1
Re:Go Proposal: Accept GitHub PRs
on Thursday January 05, 2017 @08:30PM (#13333191)
> you can have both a CLA and be BSD
Not the case - they can claim it is so, but a BSD license with extra clauses is not a BSD license.
Re:Go Proposal: Accept GitHub PRs
on Thursday January 05, 2017 @06:33PM (#13332514)
I don't like the idea of handing over my contributions to another party under their terms. Either release software under a common open source license (BSD, MIT) or not. Don't add additional terms with some custom license that certainly wouldn't help me.
Re:Go Proposal: Accept GitHub PRs
on Thursday January 05, 2017 @05:01PM (#13331829)
~~You got me on Postgres. Don't use the others.~~
Edit: another post states that Postgres doesn't require a CLA for contributors. So I don't use any software requiring a CLA.
Re:Go Proposal: Accept GitHub PRs
on Thursday January 05, 2017 @04:53PM (#13331769)
I contribute pull requests to quite a few github projects. However I avoid contributing to (or even using) projects with a Contributor License Agreement. Such projects are too bureaucratic.