yagbo7
Re:Google defends scrapping AI pledges and DEI goals in all-staff meeting
on Sunday February 16, 2025 @08:21PM (#43073801)
Don’t take it out of context.
> “It’s better explained by stating the tech industry is dominated by certain demographics because that’s just how it is”
Re:Google defends scrapping AI pledges and DEI goals in all-staff meeting
on Sunday February 16, 2025 @08:07PM (#43073695)
Perhaps “benefited from” is a better term. One that doesn’t have an emotional connotation.
Re:Google defends scrapping AI pledges and DEI goals in all-staff meeting
on Sunday February 16, 2025 @08:05PM (#43073676)
It depends which side you look at it from. Increasing diversity of the group being hired into, means that a potentially discriminatory hiring approach must be taken, depending on the candidate applying.
Re:Google defends scrapping AI pledges and DEI goals in all-staff meeting
on Sunday February 16, 2025 @07:28PM (#43073389)
Cool your jets. I called a spade a spade, I never said anything about it being natural.
Re:Google defends scrapping AI pledges and DEI goals in all-staff meeting
on Sunday February 16, 2025 @07:00PM (#43073178)
That’s a circular definition; stating it’s not about preferential hiring but then saying it’s about not giving a certain demographic preferential treatment.
“Enjoyed” is not the right word either. It’s better explained by stating the tech industry is dominated by certain demographics because that’s just how it is, and DEI initiatives give preferential treatment to those who are not in those demographics, in an attempt to increase diversity, and give equitable opportunities, and make people feel included.