News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

xcvd

Re:Wi-Fi-Only Motorola Xoom To Hit Stores March 27 on Wednesday March 16, 2011 @08:34PM (#2334585)
What would you prefer? Thousands of apps approved by "a small team in California", which are generally spyware free.

OR a handful of apps specifically designed for your platform.

Re:Google Font Directory (expanded, moved to new URL) on Wednesday February 23, 2011 @11:52PM (#2256951)
Doesn't work in FF 3.6?

Looking at the actual Google page, the fonts don't load.

Re:.ng SLD Registration Url on Wednesday February 09, 2011 @05:15PM (#2199598)
I don't see any details about pricing.

Feels bad giving away all my details before I even know how much I'd need to pay.

Re:.ng SLD Registration Url on Wednesday February 09, 2011 @12:33AM (#2196505)
Feels dodgy

Why would I submit my personal details before knowing all the other steps?

Re:Why Android will win the tablet wars on Monday January 31, 2011 @01:57PM (#2162681)
Yes. Have fun playing with the open source code to the Google Maps app. Or the Mail app. Or the source code to the Market. Or removing all the vendor spamware.

Really. This article overlooks things.

Also.... and this is a big one...... owning a smart phone does not mean you use it as a smart phone...... it is meaningless to "win" this battle just by numbers...... some people own a washing machine just to store bottles in it.

Re:Steve Jobs' liver transplant: Did he game the system? on Wednesday January 19, 2011 @07:10PM (#2121907)
This article has been taken down?

Even if Apple has muscled in, Slate must not have any strength in their convictions/gossiping.

Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Wednesday January 12, 2011 @05:51PM (#2098051)
My point is.... Yes, ship in four weeks, but ship to modern browsers with an elegant html5-only decision

Old browsers can have a single, basic file input.

Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Tuesday January 11, 2011 @12:05AM (#2090959)
No, I genuinely would prefer the browser natively handle file transfers rather than relying on old browser plugins and lots of hacks to get old browsers to work
Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Tuesday January 11, 2011 @12:03AM (#2090951)
Complexity.

Dropping back to native is thinking about the future rather than supporting the past with tired hacks and stupid browser plugins.

Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Monday January 10, 2011 @10:52PM (#2090786)
As mentioned below, this seems very good http://valums.com/ajax-upload/

I'd be more comfortable styling this to fit my needs than a forced fully blown gizmo

Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Monday January 10, 2011 @10:35PM (#2090755)
Thanks!

I like the ajax upload.... very simple

fancyupload uses flash.... unless you are Facebook or a government website, I'd avoid all that fancy stuff and keep it simple for the future!

Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Monday January 10, 2011 @10:01PM (#2090679)
I mean, screw supporting old browsers

Given them a basic, single file uploaded with no fancy

A clean HTML5 implementation, with nice features, is more valued

Re:Plupload - A beautiful file uploader powered by jQuery on Monday January 10, 2011 @09:58PM (#2090673)
I'm frustrated that in this day and age this is the best solution people recommend.

Are there any elegant HTML5 multiple file uploaders out there with drag and drop?

That, and direct S3 upload, is the Holy Grail for me.